
Adjunctive Therapies to Prevent Atherothrombosis
by James OKeefe, Jr, MD (Director of Preventive Medicine, Mid-America Heart
Institute, Kansas City, MO), Mark S. Freed, MD (Cardiologist, President of Physicians'
Press), and Christie Ballantyne, MD (Clinical Director, Section of Atherosclerosis, Baylor
College of Medicine)
In addition to control of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and lifestyle
modification (diet, exercise, smoking cessation), the risk for atherothrombotic events may
also be reduced by therapies that target mechanisms such as thrombosis and oxidation.
EVIDENCE-BASED THERAPY
Aspirin
Aspirin has been consistently shown to prevent MI and stroke in patients at risk for
atherosclerotic vascular disease. Although aspirin does not prevent atherosclerosis, it
does inhibit platelet function and decreases the likelihood that an occlusive thrombus
will form at the site of an inflamed and ulcerated atherosclerotic plaque. The optimal
aspirin dose is between 81 and 325 mg daily. Doses in excess of 325 mg per day are
associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in a dose-dependent fashion.
Enteric-coated or buffered forms of aspirin are no less likely to cause gastrointestinal
bleeding than soluble aspirin. Low-dose aspirin (81-162 mg) should be considered for
patients on an ACE inhibitor or with a history of serious bleeding, especially from the
gastrointestional tract. All patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) should be on
aspirin therapy unless a very strong contraindication exists (e.g., anaphylaxis). Aspirin
should also be used in high-risk primary prevention (2 or more risk factors), and in
middle-aged or older patients with elevated LDL cholesterol, increased high-sensitivity
C-reactive protein, or hypertension. The most recent recommendations for the use of
aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events for the US Preventive Services
Task Force have been published in the January 15, 2002 issue of Annals of Internal
Medicine (vol. 136, pp. 155-172).
Clopidogrel (Plavix)
Clopidogrel interferes with ADP-mediated platelet activation and is somewhat more
effective at platelet inhibition than aspirin. These two agents have additive effects when
used in combination. Clopidogrel has been shown to be improve event-free survival in CAD
patients compared to aspirin in the CAPRIE secondary prevention study, particularly in
patients with peripheral vascular disease. Compared to aspirin alone, combined
antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin improved clinical outcome in patients
with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. The safety profile
of clopidogrel is similar to low-dose aspirin, with a rare incidence of thrombotic
thrombocytopenic purpura. Clopidogrel is indicated for use in aspirin-intolerant patients,
those at very high risk for cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, and for acute
coronary syndromes.
CAPRIE Trial |
Design |
Results |
Clopidogrel
vs. Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (Lancet 1996;348:1329) |
19,185
patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease (MI within 35 days, ischemic stroke within
6 months, or established peripheral arterial disease) randomized to clopidogrel (75 mg/d)
or aspirin (325 mg/d). |
At
1.6 years, clopidogrel reduced the combined endpoint of new ischemic stroke, new MI, or
other vascular death by 8.7% relative to aspirin (p = 0.045). Benefit was greatest in
patients with peripheral artery disease (especially if prior MI). |
CURE Trial |
Design |
Results |
Clopidogrel in
Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (New Engl J Med 2001;345:494-502) |
12,562 patients
with unstable angina or non-Q-wave MI were randomized to aspirin (75-325 mg/day) alone or
aspirin plus clopidogrel (300 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg/day) for 3-12 months
(average 9 months). |
Clopidogrel
resulted in a highly significant 20% relative reduction in the primary composite endpoint
of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke (9.3% vs. 11.4%, p < 0.001). There was a 1%
absolute increase in major bleeding with clopidogrel (3.7% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.001), but the
incidence of life-threatening bleeding was similar between groups. |
Low-dose Fish Oil (also see, Mediterranean Diet)
In the GISSI Prevention Study, 1 g/d (850 mg of DHA and EPA) of fish oil, a dose too low
to affect lipid levels, significantly reduced total mortality by 20%, due in large part to
a 45% reduction in sudden cardiac death.
GISSI Trial |
Design |
Results |
Gruppo Italiano
per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico (Lancet 1999;354:447) |
11,324 men and
women with prior MI were randomized to fish oil ~1 g/d, vitamin E 300 mg/d, both, or
placebo for 3.5 years. Baseline LDL-C was 138 mg/dL. |
Fish oil alone or
in combination reduced all-cause mortality by 20%, sudden death by 45%, and cardiovascular
death by 30%. Vitamin E produced no benefit on these endpoints. |
ACE Inhibitors
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors block the conversion of angiotensin I to
angiotensin II and inhibit the breakdown of bradykinin, resulting in physiologic benefits
that confer unique cardioprotective and renoprotective properties to this class of drugs.
ACE inhibitors have been shown to improve prognosis in a wide variety of cardiovascular
disorders, including hypertension, heart failure, asymptomatic LV dysfunction, MI,
post-coronary revascularization procedures, and proteinuric nephropathy. Most recently,
compelling data from the HOPE trial demonstrated an important role for ACE inhibitors in
the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic vascular disease and in the
development of new-onset diabetes mellitus. Ramipril is approved to reduce the risk of MI,
stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes in patients 55 years or older at high risk of
developing a major cardiovascular event because of a history of coronary artery disease,
stroke, peripheral arterial disease, or diabetes that is accompanied by at least one other
cardiovascular risk factor (hypertension, elevated total cholesterol levels, low HDL
levels, cigarette smoking, or documented microalbuminuria). Ramipril can be used in
addition to other needed treatment, including antihypertensive, antiplatelet, and
lipid-lowering therapy. The recommended starting dose is 2.5 mg once daily for 1 week,
increased to 5 mg once daily for the next 3 weeks, then increased as tolerated to a
maintainence dose of 10 mg once a day (which may be given in 2 divided doses for patients
who have hypertension or who are post-MI).
ACE inhibitors are generally
safe, well-tolerated, and affordable. Patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease,
diabetes, or insulin resistance should therefore be considered for ACE inhibitor therapy
unless they have an intolerable cough, systolic blood pressure consistently below 100-110
mmHg, or renal failure (creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL). Angiotensin receptor blockers are not
equivalent to ACE inhibitors, but nevertheless may be a reasonable alternative for
patients who are intolerant to ACE inhibitor therapy.
HOPE Trial |
Design |
Results |
Heart Outcomes
Prevention Evaluation (N Engl J Med 2000;342:145 [ramipril], N Engl J Med 2000;342:154
[vitamin E]) |
9297 men and
women aged > 55 years with vascular disease or diabetes plus 1 other
cardiovascular risk factor but without LV dysfunction or heart failure were randomized to
ramipril 10 mg/d, vitamin E 400 IU, both, or placebo and followed up for a mean of 5
years. |
The primary
endpoint, a composite of MI, stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes, was reduced by
22% with ramipril, and all-cause mortality was reduced by 16%. Vitamin E produced no
benefit on events. |
POSSIBLE BENEFIT FOR PREVENTION OF ATHEROTHROMBOSIS
Folic Acid
Homocysteine is an amino acid by-product of protein metabolism. An elevated fasting
homocysteine levels is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events and
cardiovascular mortality, particularly in patients already diagnosed with CAD. Although
the mechanism of action is not clearly understood, homocysteine appears capable of
damaging endothelium and promoting a prothrombogenic environment. All adults should be
encouraged to take at least 400 mcg of folic acid daily by diet and/or supplementation.
Foods that are rich in folate include broccoli, spinach, and other green leafy vegetables,
citrus fruits, asparagus, and beans. Because of the lack of outcome trials, currently
there are no consensus panel recommendations on criteria for measurement of homocysteine.
In our practices, we measure homocysteine in patients with premature or severe
atherosclerosis. Folic acid supplementation as well as supplementation with vitamins B6
and B12 have been shown to decrease homocysteine levels by approximately
15-30%. If elevated homocysteine levels are present, folic acid (800-1600 mcg per day) in
conjunction with vitamin B12 (250 mcg per day) and vitamin B 6
(20-25 mg per day) should be prescribed.
Vitamin E
Vitamin E is an antioxidant vitamin that gets incorporated into lipoprotein particles
and prevents the oxidation of LDL, an integral step in atherogenesis. In the CHAOS study,
vitamin E decreased the risk of MI in patients with documented coronary disease. However,
in the much larger GISSI Prevention and HOPE studies, vitamin E produced no benefit on
cardiovascular endpoints. At the present, there is no clear evidence for the benefit of
vitamin E on reducing CHD events. Some data suggest the combination of vitamins E and C is
more effective at reducing atherosclerotic progression than either vitamin alone, although
this issue has not been addressed in a large-scale trial.
Vitamin C
Vitamin C (250-500 mg daily) is another antioxidant that may be used in conjunction
with vitamin E, although prospective trial data are pending.
Beta-carotene
No cardiovascular benefit has been shown with beta-carotene in the Linxian Cancer
Prevention Trial; the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study; and the
final report of the Physicians' Health Study.
Estrogen Replacement Therapy
Estrogen has many potentially beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system,
including improvements in the lipid profile and endothelial function and antioxidant
effects. In observational epidemiologic studies, hormone replacement therapy has been
associated with decreased risk for MI and cardiovascular death in women with established
CAD or risk factors for CAD. However, no benefit on nonfatal MI or CAD death was
demonstrated in HERS, which randomized 2763 women (average age 67 years) with CHD to
combination conjugated estrogen (0.625 mg daily) and medroxyprogesterone (2.5 mg daily)
vs. placebo (JAMA 1998;280:605). In addition, more cardiovascular events occurred in the
first year in women receiving hormone therapy than those receiving placebo, but fewer
events occurred in the hormone group in years 4 and 5. Hormone therapy was also associated
with an increased risk for thromboembolic events and gallbladder disease. Estrogen also
provided no angiographic benefit in the ERA trial, which randomized 309 women with
angiographic CAD to estrogen alone, estrogen plus medroxyprogestrone acetate, or placebo.
The primary endpoint, per-patient mean minimum lumen diameter of 10 coronary segments at
baseline and mean 3.2-year follow-up, was not significantly different among treatment
groups (NEJM 2000;343:522).
Definitive evidence to support
routine use of hormone replacement therapy in women for the prevention of cardiovascular
disease is lacking. The ongoing Women's Health Initiative trial, involving more than
63,000 women, and the Womens International Study of Long Duration Oestrogen After
Menopause (WISDOM) will provide information on the use of estrogen for primary prevention.
When estrogen replacement therapy is administered, concomitant use of medroxyprogesterone
(Provera) 2.5 mg daily is necessary for women who have not previously undergone
hysterectomy. Yearly mammograms and Pap smears are also required. In women with
triglyceride levels higher than 300 mg/dL, oral estrogen can cause triglycerides to rise
to more than 1,000 mg/dL, increasing the risk of pancreatitis. A fasting lipid profile
should be evaluated before beginning postmenopal estrogen replacement, and patients
with triglyceride levels >300 mg/dL should be placed on a program of diet, weight loss
if necessary, and exercise before initiating estrogen therapy. Topical therapy with a
patch can be used in patients with hypertriglyceridemia if indicated without exacerbating
the triglyceride elevation. Patch therapy, however, will not raise HDL cholesterol or
lower LDL cholesterol.
AHA
Science Advisory: Summary Recommendations for Hormone Replacement Therapy and
Cardiovascular Disease
(Circulation 2001;104:499-503) |
| Secondary Prevention HRT should not be initiated for the secondary prevention of CVD
The decision to continue or storp HRT in women with CVD on
long-term HRT should be based on established non-coronary benefits and risks and patient
preference
If a women develops an acute CVD event or is immobilized
while undergoing HRT, it is prudent to consider discontinuance of the HRT or to consider
venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis during hospitalization to minimize the risk of
VTE. Reinstitution should be based on established non-coronary benefits and risks and
patient preference |
| Primary Prevention Firm clinical recommendations for primary prevention await the
results of ongoing trials
There are insufficient data to suggest that HRT should be
initiated for the sole purpose of primary prevention of CVD
Initiation and continuation of HRT should be based on
established non-coronary benefits and risks, possible coronary benefits and risks, and
patient preference |
Selective estrogen
receptor modulators (SERMs), such as raloxifene, appear to provide many of the benefits of
estrogen without the increased risk for cancer. The potential cardioprotective effects of
have recently been examined in the MORE study with raloxifene (Evista), and suggest no
early increase in cardiovascular events (as with HRT), and a possible reduction in
long-term cardiac events in women at high risk for cardiovascular disease. Recommendations
on the use of SERMs for prevention of cardiovascular disease await the results of ongoing
trials such as the Raloxifene Use for The Heart (RUTH), which is enrolling 10,000
post-menopal at high risk for or with established coronary disease, and is evaluating
cardiovascular events as a predefined outcome.
MORE Trial |
Design |
Results |
Multiple Outcomes
of Raloxifene Evaluation. JAMA 2002;287:845-57 |
7705 osteoporotic
postmenopal women randomized to raloxifene 60 mg or 120 mg daily or placebo for 4
years. |
Cardiovascular
events were no different between groups in the overall cohert, but in the subset of 1035
women at increased CV risk at baseline, CV events occurred in 12.9% in the placebo group
and 7.8% in the raloxifene group (RR = 0.60) |
ARCHIVES |
| The other archives
can be reached by returning to the Topical
Reviews page and clicking on the individual links there.
|
© 2009 Jones and Bartlett Publishers
|